<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blurring the Line Between Reality and Television</title>
	<link>http://www.evanrowlands.com/entertainment/blurring-the-line-between-television-and-reality/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: NIAC</title>
		<link>http://www.evanrowlands.com/entertainment/blurring-the-line-between-television-and-reality/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>NIAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.evanrowlands.com/entertainment/blurring-the-line-between-television-and-reality/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>The 'phantom account' is the best way to handle it, I would guess.  I mean it is roughly the same if people like Pitt and Jolie take their child to school, right?  Celebrity is only celebrity when there are fans.  There is good and bad in all, so bad fans just make it suck for "good" (read, perhaps, naive?) celebrities.

PS...thanks for the blogroll listing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;phantom account&#8217; is the best way to handle it, I would guess.  I mean it is roughly the same if people like Pitt and Jolie take their child to school, right?  Celebrity is only celebrity when there are fans.  There is good and bad in all, so bad fans just make it suck for &#8220;good&#8221; (read, perhaps, naive?) celebrities.</p>
<p>PS&#8230;thanks for the blogroll listing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
